compare

Selling Now vs. in 3 Years: Dental Practice Decisions

Selling now vs. in 3 years requires a fair comparison of cash, owner work and uncertainty. Use the same ending date, separate labor income from ownership cash and test more than one future sale result. This guide provides an invented comparison model without assuming practice values will rise or choosing a retirement plan for you.

Book a confidential seller call
On this page

Key takeaways

  • Compare alternatives on the same calendar and with consistent cash definitions.
  • Separate compensation for the owner's work from the modeled ownership component.
  • Test future proceeds and capital needs instead of assuming appreciation.

Selling now vs. in 3 years needs a common comparison date

Selling now vs. in 3 years is a comparison of cash, work, risk and personal timing. It is not just a guess about a later sale price. Waiting may produce owner income, but part of that income pays for the dentist's labor. Selling now may free time or allow another paid role. Compare the alternatives over the same period before deciding which one fits.

This guide uses invented examples to show the method. It makes no prediction about practice values, future demand, tax rates or investment returns. Your advisers need current practice records, actual household needs and transaction terms before using a model for a real decision. The arithmetic can reveal a missing assumption; it cannot choose the right life plan.

The ADA preparation guide encourages owners to clarify finances and future plans. Begin there, then state exactly what the waiting period is meant to accomplish. “The price may be higher” is not a complete plan. A documented operating change, a personal date or a defined succession goal gives the comparison something testable.

State what each alternative includes

Choose a shared end date. Record cash received before that date, costs incurred to produce it and the net sale cash expected at the end. Separate gross price from proceeds after the uses included in your model. Also identify what work the owner performs in each path. A cash advantage from more labor should remain visible as such.

The CFPB retirement resource distinguishes income, debts and assets in retirement planning. That broad distinction matters here: an ownership interest, household income and money already received are different inputs. None should quietly stand in for another.

Comparison fieldSell nowSell later
Ownership cashReviewed current net proceedsFuture net proceeds under explicit scenarios
WorkPost-sale role, another role or no workOwner's clinical and management duties
Operating exposureAny actual continuing obligationsCosts and risks retained while owning
CalendarMoney received earlierInterim receipts and later sale date
Personal fitTime and duties after current closingCommitments during the waiting period

If the owner would not work after selling, leave post-sale pay out. If the owner would take an associate role, use the proposed work and usable compensation assumptions. Do not select different career plans only to make one option look better. State the reason for each path before calculating its result.

Worked example: total cash can conceal a labor difference

This invented model covers exactly 3 years and uses nominal, pre-personal-tax cash. It assumes no investment return on early sale proceeds and no inflation. All terminal sale figures are net of the sale costs and debt included in that scenario. Annual owner withdrawals are after modeled operating expenses and ordinary debt service. No separate major capital project is included in the base case.

Invented base-case cashSell nowWait 3 years
Net sale cash received within the comparison$650,000 now$600,000 at the end
Annual cash from work or ownership$65,000 associate pay$150,000 owner withdrawals
Three annual receipts$195,000$450,000
Total nominal cash over the period$845,000$1,050,000

Waiting shows $205,000 more total cash under these inputs. But the seller keeps doing the owner's clinical and management work in that path. The associate role has its own assumed scope. These are not equal jobs, and this table is not an investment-return calculation. It also does not establish retirement spending power because personal taxes and timing have not been modeled.

Do not deduct loan principal a second time if it was already included in the modeled annual cash or terminal net proceeds. Identify exactly which debts are serviced during ownership and which remain at sale. A model can understate or overstate an option when it changes between earnings, distributions and net proceeds without explaining the change.

Separate an allowance for owner labor from ownership cash

For teaching purposes, allocate $110,000 of each year's $150,000 owner withdrawals to the combined clinical and management labor in the waiting path. This is an invented allocation, not a market salary, payroll item, tax deduction or formal valuation adjustment. The remaining $40,000 is the model's ownership component. Real replacement costs and duties need evidence.

Invented decompositionCalculationAmount
Annual ownership component$150,000 minus $110,000$40,000
Three-year ownership component$40,000 multiplied by 3$120,000
Wait-path ownership cash$120,000 plus $600,000$720,000
Current sale cashAssumed net proceeds$650,000
Difference in ownership cash$720,000 minus $650,000$70,000

The remaining $135,000 of the original $205,000 difference comes from the model's labor allocation: $110,000 minus $65,000 each year, multiplied by 3. That does not mean the owner must accept that pay tradeoff. It shows why calling the whole $205,000 an ownership gain would obscure the work required.

The ADA article on selling before retirement describes continued work as a possible option after a sale. Use the associate-after-sale guide to examine the role itself. A hypothetical salary in a comparison is not an available job or guaranteed future pay.

Find the assumption that changes the decision

Hold the annual ownership component at the invented $40,000 and change only the future net sale cash. If that later amount is $500,000, the ownership comparison becomes $120,000 plus $500,000, or $620,000. That is $30,000 below the $650,000 current-sale figure. The direction changes without altering the owner's annual labor allowance.

Now add a separate invented $60,000 major capital outlay during the waiting period. It was excluded from the base annual withdrawals and must be deducted once. The downside ownership total falls to $560,000, which is $90,000 below the current-sale figure. This does not predict a required equipment purchase or its effect on value.

Invented wait-path scenarioFuture net sale cashExtra capital outlayOwnership totalDifference from $650,000
Base$600,000$0$720,000$70,000
Lower future proceeds$500,000$0$620,000-$30,000
Lower proceeds plus outlay$500,000$60,000$560,000-$90,000

Under this simplified ownership view, the future net sale cash needed to match selling now is $530,000 without the extra outlay: $650,000 minus $120,000. With that outlay, the threshold is $590,000. These are arithmetic break-even points under the stated assumptions, not value estimates, asking prices or recommendations to hold or sell.

Add timing and tax before making a real decision

Receiving a dollar now differs from receiving it later, but the model deliberately assumes no return on earlier cash. Do not mistake that simplification for advice to hold funds idle. A qualified adviser can compare dated cash flows using an appropriate method and disclose the return, risk and tax assumptions. Different assumptions can change the result.

Also separate closing funds from deferred consideration. The IRS installment-sale topic explains that payment timing does not produce one universal tax result; gain, interest, basis and excluded items require attention. Have the tax adviser model the actual deal rather than applying a guessed flat rate to the headline price.

Use the retirement cash guide to see whether funds arrive before household spending needs. A larger eventual total may not solve an earlier shortage. Property, outside assets, health coverage and ongoing obligations also belong in the broader plan. Keep this practice comparison as one part of that review.

Make waiting an operating plan with review dates

If you choose to wait, state what you intend to change and how you will measure it. That might mean reducing dependence on the owner's schedule, resolving premises questions or improving the quality of reports. Do not assume each action will raise value. Record its cost, evidence of progress and effect on the owner's workload.

Keep a dated decision log. At each planned review, update the actual records and compare them with the prior assumptions. If a capital need, staffing change or personal event alters the plan, revise it explicitly. The phrase “three years” should not become a reason to ignore evidence that arrives earlier.

If you explore buyers during this period, use blind teasers that omit seller identity and identifying details. Require an NDA before identification is disclosed to screened buyers. Plan staff communication around needed involvement, actual progress and applicable duties. Commercial privacy must remain distinct from patient notices and controls on patient information.

Common mistakes and decision summary

Avoid treating all owner withdrawals as return on ownership, assuming an automatic price increase, or comparing one option before costs with another after costs. Do not count a capital outlay twice or omit it because its effect on future price is uncertain. Keep labor, operating cash and net proceeds in separate rows so each input can be challenged.

The right next step is to fill the same worksheet for your real alternatives, then ask advisers to review the definitions and missing evidence. State what would make you change your mind. The useful output is a decision tied to cash dates, work and realistic alternatives, with uncertainty plainly visible. A higher hypothetical total alone cannot settle it.

Frequently asked questions

Does waiting usually increase a dental practice's value?

This guide does not establish that claim. Future proceeds depend on the actual practice, buyer terms, costs and conditions at the time. Model more than one outcome and identify what evidence would support each assumption.

Why separate owner labor from ownership cash?

Owner withdrawals can include compensation for clinical and management work. Treating all of them as a return on ownership can overstate the economic benefit of waiting. Use an explicit, evidence-based labor assumption in a real review and keep its limits visible.

Is the worked example an investment-return calculation?

No. It compares nominal cash over a shared period, with no return on earlier proceeds and no personal tax or inflation model. An adviser must address dated cash flows and appropriate assumptions before using a broader financial comparison.

What if I would stop working after selling now?

Leave post-sale work income out of that path and state the personal reason for the choice. Do not include an associate salary solely to improve the comparison. Then consider the time and duties required by continued ownership.

How should a major equipment purchase enter the model?

Identify whether it is already included in annual cash assumptions. If it is excluded and needed during the waiting period, include the outlay once. Do not assume the purchase will increase future proceeds by the same amount.

What does the break-even future proceeds figure mean?

It is the amount needed to make the simplified ownership cash totals equal under the stated inputs. It is not an appraisal, a listing price or a forecast. Changing labor, capital, timing or tax assumptions can change the comparison.

Should deferred sale payments be treated like cash at closing?

No. Record the actual payment dates and conditions, then ask advisers to address tax treatment and payment risks. A household may need cash before a later receipt arrives, even when the eventual modeled total looks sufficient.

How do I make a decision to wait useful?

Write a dated operating plan with costs, evidence goals and review points. Revisit it when actual results or personal circumstances change. Waiting should remain an active choice tied to evidence, rather than a fixed period justified only by hoped-for appreciation.

Jason Taken

Business broker · HedgeStone Business Advisors

Editorial standards & limitations

Sources

Retrieval dates appear beside each source. Figures retain their stated observation years; retrieval does not make older data current.

  1. ADA: Preparing your practice for sale · Retrieved
  2. CFPB: Planning for retirement · Retrieved
  3. ADA: Selling before retirement and defining a later role · Retrieved
  4. IRS: Topic 705, installment sales · Retrieved

Your next step

Make the next decision
with a clearer picture.

Bring your questions to a confidential conversation with Jason Taken. We’ll start with your goals and the evidence needed to evaluate your options.

Schedule your introduction